Should there be a third, Croat entity in Bosnia-Herzegovina?

Krešimir Zubak, former Bosnian Croat leader, who was the only delegate to refuse to sign the Dayton peace agreement, argues that it is necessary to discuss openly the demand for a third, Croat entity in Bosnia and Herzegovina

If one adds to the argument of legitimacy the fact that Croat representatives are now habitually ignored in the state and federal parliament, and in the Federation’s executive bodies, in a way that openly violates the constitution (e.g. in regard to national representation at the highest level), then the advocates of a third entity appear quite justified in their demand.

...the Croats, like the other Bosnian nations, are a sovereign people who can freely judge and decide on their rights, interests and needs. Our sovereignty is limited only by the sovereignty of the two other peoples with whom we form the common state of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Accordingly, if one of the three peoples possesses (more exactly, was given) an entity with a clearly demarcated territory that bears its name and is called a republic, then the Bosnian Croats too have a right to form their own entity along similar lines.

Make money online NOW